Abstract
The article presents a gradual shift from the individual concept of data protection to the application of the group concept in the case of genetic data, which by its nature applies to more than one person. The application of the group concept is based on the norms of EU law, the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, the Court of Justice of the European Union, the Supreme Court of Iceland, as well as soft law documents. The jurisprudence presented in the paper argues that genetic information is relevant both to the donor of genetic material and to his relatives. Thus, the genetic data of person A created from a biological sample taken from him, may also constitute the genetic data of person B. Thus, the status of the data subject established under EU law should be extended to a larger number of persons than suggested by EU data protection legislation. The argumentation presented confirms the formation of indicating the group nature of genetic data. The continuous increase in the amount of genetic information in social and economic circulation will only reinforce this trend, which is aimed at the full realization of the right to personal data protection.
References
• Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Opinion 4/2007 on the concept of personal data, Czerwiec 2007, 01248/07/EN WP 136.
• E.A. Ashley, Geny. Medyczne tajemnice i niesamowita opowieść o ich wyjaśnieniu, Poznań 2021.
• J.L. Contreras, V. Deshmukh, Development of the Personal Genomics Industry, [w:] S.Bouregy, E.L.Grigorenko, S.R. Latham, M.Tan (red.), Genetics, Ethics and Education, Cambridge 2017.
• R.A. Costello, Genetic Data and the Right to Privacy: Towards a Relational Theory of Privacy?, Human Rights Law Review, 2022 (22).
• J. Doleac, Can DNA Databases Reduce Crime Rates? https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2017/05/16/can-dna-databases-reduce-crime-rates/?sh=28b812e657.
• R.Gebelhoff, Sequencing the genome creates so much data we don’t know what to do with it, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2015/07/07/sequencing-the-genome-creates-so-much-data-we-dont-know-what-to-do-with-it/.
• Genetic Privacy, Nature, 2013, Tom 493.
• Genomic Data Science, https://www.genome.gov/about-genomics/fact-sheets/Genomic-Data-Science.
• R. Getz, An analysis of the Icelandic Supreme Court Judgement on the Health Sector Database Act, SCRIPT-ed, 1(2)/2004.
• D. Hallinan, M. Friedewald, P. De Hert, Genetic Data and the Data Protection Regulation: Anonymity, multiple subjects, sensitivity and a prohibitionary logic regarding genetic data?, Computer Law & Security Review 2013, Tom 29.
• C. WL Ho, T. SH Kaan, The Notion of Genetic Privacy, [w:] T. Sheung-Hung Kaan, C. Wai-Loon Ho (red.) Genetic Privacy: An Evolution of Ethical and Legal Landscape, Londyn 2013.
• Krajewska, Informacja genetyczna a zakres autonomii jednostki w europejskiej przestrzeni prawnej, Wrocław, 2008.
• T. Kuru, Genetic Data: The Achilles' Heel of the GDPR?, European Data Protection Law Review, 45(2021).
• M. McCarthy, Am I my brother’s keeper?: Familial DNA searches in the twenty-first century, Notre Dame Law Review, Tom 86(1).
• Mesko, The Genomic Data Challenges Of The Future, https://medicalfuturist.com/the-genomic-data-challenges-of-the-future/.
• N.Purtova, The law of everything. Broad concept of personal data and future of EU data protection law, Law, Innovation and Technology, 2018, Tom 10(1), s. 75
• M. Safjan, Prawo do prywatności i ochrona danych osobowych w społeczeństwie informatycznym, Państwo i Prawo, nr 6 (2002).
• Xenos, The Positive Obligations of the State under the European Convention of Human Rights, Nowy Jork, 2012.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Kacper Olejniczak